<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Net New Media</title>
	<atom:link href="http://netnewmedia.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://netnewmedia.com</link>
	<description>Web Design &#38; Development &#124; SEO &#124; Internet Marketing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 Sep 2010 06:42:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Using CSS to Create an SEO Friendly HTML Layout by John_Betong</title>
		<link>http://netnewmedia.com/using-css-to-create-an-seo-friendly-html-layout/comment-page-1/#comment-21</link>
		<dc:creator>John_Betong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Sep 2010 06:42:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://netnewmedia.com/?p=170#comment-21</guid>
		<description>Impressive and I will start to use your template on my websites.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Just one small point:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;HTML validation fails, please remove the px from your image width and height statements&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Impressive and I will start to use your template on my websites.</p>
<p>Just one small point:</p>
<p>HTML validation fails, please remove the px from your image width and height statements</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Choosing the Right Open Source PHP CMS for the Job by Martin Przybyla</title>
		<link>http://netnewmedia.com/choosing-the-best-open-source-php-cms/comment-page-1/#comment-17</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin Przybyla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 14:13:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://netnewmedia.com/?p=91#comment-17</guid>
		<description>I wasn&#039;t aware of Pixie, though it does look like an interesting option for smaller sites, I&#039;ll have to try it out sometime</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wasn&#39;t aware of Pixie, though it does look like an interesting option for smaller sites, I&#39;ll have to try it out sometime</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Choosing the Right Open Source PHP CMS for the Job by judi</title>
		<link>http://netnewmedia.com/choosing-the-best-open-source-php-cms/comment-page-1/#comment-16</link>
		<dc:creator>judi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2010 16:20:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://netnewmedia.com/?p=91#comment-16</guid>
		<description>Hi &lt;br&gt;I really like your list&lt;br&gt;From a designers point of view its really useful.&lt;br&gt;What about &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.getpixie.co.uk?&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.getpixie.co.uk?&lt;/a&gt; It looks really easy to use&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Regards&lt;br&gt;Judi</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi <br />I really like your list<br />From a designers point of view its really useful.<br />What about <a href="http://www.getpixie.co.uk?" rel="nofollow">http://www.getpixie.co.uk?</a> It looks really easy to use</p>
<p>Regards<br />Judi</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Building Optimized, SEO Friendly XHTML Templates by theroadsouth</title>
		<link>http://netnewmedia.com/optimized-seo-html-templates/comment-page-1/#comment-15</link>
		<dc:creator>theroadsouth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 00:44:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://netnewmedia.com/?p=1#comment-15</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I think the term paper analogy is a decent way of looking at it.  You can add all sorts of effects to your site with CSS and  libraries such as jQuery, but at the end of the day search engines ignore most of that.  What matters to them is the underlying content and how it&#039;s structured, as well as some other factors such as site performance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I think the term paper analogy is a decent way of looking at it.  You can add all sorts of effects to your site with CSS and  libraries such as jQuery, but at the end of the day search engines ignore most of that.  What matters to them is the underlying content and how it&#39;s structured, as well as some other factors such as site performance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Building Optimized, SEO Friendly XHTML Templates by ccountey</title>
		<link>http://netnewmedia.com/optimized-seo-html-templates/comment-page-1/#comment-14</link>
		<dc:creator>ccountey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 18:52:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://netnewmedia.com/?p=1#comment-14</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your response. That makes sense and I was taught that search engines of old liked websites that were built almost like term papers in structure and with lots of content. Think that still applies even though websites can do so much more now?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your response. That makes sense and I was taught that search engines of old liked websites that were built almost like term papers in structure and with lots of content. Think that still applies even though websites can do so much more now?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Building Optimized, SEO Friendly XHTML Templates by theroadsouth</title>
		<link>http://netnewmedia.com/optimized-seo-html-templates/comment-page-1/#comment-13</link>
		<dc:creator>theroadsouth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 15:50:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://netnewmedia.com/?p=1#comment-13</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think Google&#039;s algorithms differentiates much between a html list and a paragraph tag.  Personally, I always use what is semantically correct (i.e. If I am describing a list of items I use li&#039;s, if they are paragraphs of text, the p tag is more important.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#39;t think Google&#39;s algorithms differentiates much between a html list and a paragraph tag.  Personally, I always use what is semantically correct (i.e. If I am describing a list of items I use li&#39;s, if they are paragraphs of text, the p tag is more important.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Building Optimized, SEO Friendly XHTML Templates by ccountey</title>
		<link>http://netnewmedia.com/optimized-seo-html-templates/comment-page-1/#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator>ccountey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 19:33:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://netnewmedia.com/?p=1#comment-10</guid>
		<description>sigh.. ul li vs p (paragraph) tags</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sigh.. ul li vs p (paragraph) tags</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Building Optimized, SEO Friendly XHTML Templates by ccountey</title>
		<link>http://netnewmedia.com/optimized-seo-html-templates/comment-page-1/#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>ccountey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 19:33:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://netnewmedia.com/?p=1#comment-9</guid>
		<description>... correction: &lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt; vs &quot;&lt;p&gt;&quot; ...&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230; correction: &lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt; vs &#8220;
<p>&#8221; &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Building Optimized, SEO Friendly XHTML Templates by ccountey</title>
		<link>http://netnewmedia.com/optimized-seo-html-templates/comment-page-1/#comment-8</link>
		<dc:creator>ccountey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 19:32:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://netnewmedia.com/?p=1#comment-8</guid>
		<description>You seem to be on the same page as me in terms of basic page structure. What do you know about how Google looks at &lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt; vs &lt;p&gt;? On our homepage, I&#039;ve listed the top landing pages in &lt;p&gt; within &lt;h1&gt; classes, and I&#039;m wondering if I should be using &lt;ul&gt; lists instead. The content is on the page though. I just want to know what you think Google will perceive as more important.&lt;/h1&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You seem to be on the same page as me in terms of basic page structure. What do you know about how Google looks at &lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt; vs
<p>? On our homepage, I&#39;ve listed the top landing pages in </p>
<p> within<br />
<h1> classes, and I&#39;m wondering if I should be using &lt;ul&gt; lists instead. The content is on the page though. I just want to know what you think Google will perceive as more important.</h1></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Building Optimized, SEO Friendly XHTML Templates by Browse</title>
		<link>http://netnewmedia.com/optimized-seo-html-templates/comment-page-1/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>Browse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 11:15:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://netnewmedia.com/?p=1#comment-5</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Browse...&lt;/strong&gt;

Nifty approach....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Browse&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Nifty approach&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.185 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2012-05-18 16:42:51 -->

